Framing the Debate
I am not against the library expansion. Far from it. What I am against is the closing of 2nd ave without providing any alternative other than not expanding. I hate that we are painting all people that oppose the plan as being "anti library". It is a no win when we allow the argument to be framed like that (and quite unfair). The people that are doing this are doing the town a disservice. I talked to a person the other day about the library expansion. A totally non partisan citizen who brought the subject up to me. They said "I don't want to be against the library expansion, they need it, but do they need to close 2nd ave?" What does this person do? Suck it up and support the expansion or seek to promote other options? I truly felt bad for the dilemma this patron of the library was going through.
Both sides are way off on this. The library will not be able to financially handle a satellite branch. The library will not be able to meet its parking requirements if they expand. There need to be a compromise. Why wont we consider another story on an expanded library and keep 2nd ave open. Why won't the library consider property acquisition for their expansion. Why won't the library consider closing the alley and expanding that way. Compromise through open dialog will solve this. I have no doubt.